Archive for March, 2008

posted by perkiset on Mar 18

Today I watched as a man who happens to be black, make history. It’s not the black part that makes it so impressive – in fact, that’s just a really nice cherry on top of today’s events. No – what made history today was the candor, vision and eloquence of a speech made by Barack Obama as he addressed concerns related to his former pastor.

It is an unfortunate reality, that during a campaign of any magnitude, opposition forces will find every scrap of text, print, video etc that makes you look bad and exploit it. In these days of YouTube, Google, 24 news channels, instant e-blast news alerts and so on and so forth, it is hard not to have a hundred different opinions shoved at you the moment something goes either right or wrong during the campaign season.

So it has been with a somewhat jaundiced eye that I have watched the counter-Obama forces whip the words spoken by his former pastor into a “defining moment” for Barack’s campaign. Fair enough to say that everyone has relatives and friends that have spoken things we are neither proud of or condone, but in this case the good Pastor was a bit zealous in his divisive, controversial and inflammatory oration. And since Barack has made a rather definite point about being a non-divisive candidate this was a troublesome development. The press, his constituents, supporters and opponents demanded that he address the issue. And today he did.

Before I comment on the young people crying as they called in to the local talk radio shows, or the barely-concealed impression he made on Candy Crowley and Wolf Blitzer for CNN or the soulless and silly non-comment made by the Fox network, let me say this: It is easy to be a man of honor, likeable and a good looking candidate when everything is going right. Today, he needed to address something that was potentially very wrong with his campaign and it is arguable that his very political future, much less the presidency of the United States, rode on his words. Suffice to say that you know more of a man’s character with how he handles duress, than with success.

And today we witnessed his character.

Unwilling to concede that his relationship to the pastor was in some way wrong, he stood tall and proud. He embraced the challenges of his campaign – nigh, even that of America itself –boldly and square on. He movingly ran the gamut from his personal heritage, to the root causes of racism in America today to the audacity of hope – and in the process, may well have both clinched the presidency and his place in history. Even my wife, a Hillary supporter, was moved and taken back by his strength, character and clarity of vision. “This did it for him.” Was her initial and most important comment.

Watching CNN now and listening to the commentators, every so many of them comment from a position of why he is wrong – “he didn’t talk enough about health care for the Hispanic community.” “He can’t really make a difference unless he completely disowns the pastor.” “Hillary has a better solution for the health care problem.” “He has no right to tell ME what is racist.” “He’s only preaching to his own choir.” “He didn’t do enough to let people who were offended by the Reverend’s comments that he repudiates them.” Personally I find these commentators and even the press itself repugnant. They take the words of arguably the most genuine candidate we’ve seen in a great long time and twist it into rubble. In my opinion we have a man who genuinely wants to make a difference and I believe he can.

For what it’s worth, I believe I saw history in the making today. I believe I saw a different kind of politician utter a different kinds of words – words that need to be said today, said eloquently, candidly and from the soul of a man who can lead this nation somewhere better than where we are today. I hope that I am right on this one.

And yes, I heard people crying on the radio having been so moved by the speech. I heard Wolf Blitzer say essentially that Obama made a speech and it was important. Fox issued a news release that was simply, “Obama repudiates speech made by pastor by defends relationship.” We’re an interesting country – one that has given up on hope and likes instead to imagine our political landscape to look more like The Octagon or Full Contact Bloodsport. We are so lost in our own agony that at the moment, the only solace seems to be witnessing and joining in on the tearing down of others.

Obama hit the right note. People should listen, rather than simply wait for him to finish speaking so that they can refute what they did not hear.

posted by perkiset on Mar 17

… the newest member of the Perkiset family, Cooper! A rust-red standard, he’ll wind up probably in the 40-45lb zone - about 1/2 Lucas’ weight. Everyone is delighted and he’ll make a wonderful addition to our family. Thanks for checking him out!


With Cody

First time on grass

posted by perkiset on Mar 7

Strike One: Refuses to denounce Rush Limbaugh and the conservative cabal that essentially handed her the win in Texas - for their own purposes, including the complete sublimation of our Democratic process. Clearly she is comfortable winning by any means necessary and is willing to be the bunnie-opponent in the fall.

Strike Two: “I’ve passed the Commander in Chief test, John McCain has certainly passed the Commander in Chief test. As for Senator Obama, well, you’ll have to ask him.” What – she was in charge when there were crises during the Clinton administration? She’s been an executive at some point and has not shared with us? When the HELL could she EVER have passed a Commander in Chief test – and more specifically, any more so than Senator Obama? Or at least enough to even make a comparison?

Strike Three: “I have said, that I bring a lifetime of experience to the table, John McCain brings a lifetime of experience. Senator Obama brings a speech he gave in 2002.”

OK now that is just horsepoop. To reduce a man’s work to a speech, regardless of if you support him or not, is just wrong. No one is reducing her to “An occasional semen receptacle for Bill Clinton” (when he couldn’t get anything else) or a hag wannabe that is unjustly and incorrectly dragging her husband’s experience and credibility unto herself. If sleeping with the president gives you credibility and experience, then perhaps Monica Lewinsky should get a cabinet post, eh? Perhaps Jennifer Flowers should be in charge of the FBI – or better, become the AG because she was somewhat adept at lying.

She is a Senator, just like Obama. She was not in cabinet meetings when the work of the president needed to be done. She did not make the decisions. She did not control ANYTHING. She failed to understand politics well enough to even get her health care initiative through. Where her husband was adored even on the day of his impeachment, she was reviled during the time she was trying to build a health care system that would take care of everyone. This would have been an excellent opportunity to demonstrate that she was of the Bill Clinton cut, rather than simply trading on the Clinton brand.

Instead she has become as shrill and horrible as her opponents claimed. Which is a real dissapointment for a long-time Clinton supporter like me.

posted by perkiset on Mar 6

That’s what the headlines will say if Hillary actually takes the nomination now.Just a little more data from yesterday (Fair notice: These are representative and incomplete. They are also scoffed from Air America directly and not researched personally)

  • One of the counties in Ohio has +/- 12,000 registered Democrats. That county registered over 28,000 democratic votes in the primary and Hillary was the overwhelming winner.
  • 8 counties in TX that went overwhelmingly for Bush in the last 2 presidential elections showed almost no Republican votes on Tuesday and an extraordinary amount of Democratic votes. Hillary again simply *killed* Obama in those counties.

 Get this my liberal & progressive friends: we are about to have our candidate picked for us by right wing assholes who’s agenda is to make us put up the most hated and Republican-galvanizing candidate we possibly can, because it’s all they’ve got. Since they cannot grab their asses with both hands much less put together a campaign that has ANYTHING to do with real contemporary thought or a vision of the future, they are resorting to any tricks they can to affect the general election.I despise them. Selfish, theocratic, pseudo-conservative morons that are destroying my country - and a lot of sheeple are letting it happen.::sigh::

posted by perkiset on Mar 5

On Air America (Thom Hartmann show) they ran a quick poll in TX to see how many people are Republican but voted for Hillary… in 15 minutes they had over 1200 emails confirming that this was exactly what they had done… Thom mentioned that a great many were actually gleeful that they could do it. Man I hate being right all the time … ;)

Now I see three possible scenarios from this new angle on brinksmanship: The right wing nutjobs win with Hillary now and win again in November, Hillary does not win and it’s an open race between McCain and Obama, or worst for them: they help Hillary take the primary and she wins the general election, in which case Rush Limbaugh would have personally assisted Hillary in getting elected. A fitting irony indeed, but still about a million miles away from today.

Copyright © 2006-2008, ME3 Inc. All Rights Reserved
WordPress Theme by Perkiset