Archive for August, 2009

posted by perkiset on Aug 28

Just how insane have we become over the health care “debate?” How much of it is real, and how much has been programmatically developed by the right wing?

BrainDonkey pointed me in the direction of a Washington Post article that I think asks a lot of great questions and points out just how crazy things have gotten. A quote:

In Pennsylvania last week, a citizen, burly, crew-cut and trembling with rage, went nose to nose with his baffled senator: “One day God’s going to stand before you, and he’s going to judge you and the rest of your damned cronies up on the Hill. And then you will get your just deserts.” He was accusing Arlen Specter of being too kind to President Obama’s proposals to make it easier for people to get health insurance.

In Michigan, meanwhile, the indelible image was of the father who wheeled his handicapped adult son up to Rep. John Dingell and bellowed that “under the Obama health-care plan, which you support, this man would be given no care whatsoever.” He pressed his case further on Fox News.

In New Hampshire, outside a building where Obama spoke, cameras trained on the pistol strapped to the leg of libertarian William Kostric. He then explained on CNN why the “tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time by the blood of tyrants and patriots.”

 

It can be found here, and is worth the read: In America, Crazy Is a Preexisting Condition

The point of the article is that people are really, really acting out wildly. IMO, this is because the Republican strategists have gotten a hold of the Third Reich’s propaganda techniques (which we saw also during the Bush presidency, repeatedly): Scare people such that logical thought no longer applies.

I believe that these people are honestly concerned about our country. I believe they have our best interest at heart. I know that they have been lied to, repeatedly, and have been injected with an irrational fear of that which they do not understand, so they act out accordingly. It is from this standpoint that the Republican and right-wing cabals have the most to atone for: blatant lies and misrepresentations, simply for the betterment of their political position - not for the betterment of society or even their constituency.

Knowing that most people will make decisions based on a context built from motivated reasoning, if the right wing can assume that many of their constituents would naturally start from a more angry or self serving or patriotic or righteous standpoint, then simply giving them reasons to validate their baseline feelings is enough to create the illusion of a logical answer. But if that natural path is then enriched with fearsome notions that penetrate below their pre-frontal cortex and get into the most basic of human emotions, you have a wolverine in a corner. Scared, pissed off, willing to jump and strike at anything because they are afraid.

It would be great if we could actually have a debate about health care. But the problem is that the right wing has whipped up so much fear, so many emotions tied to the health of a grandson, the possibility of a dark, menacing “government entity” coming to unplug grannie, that we can’t even have one. What we need to do is start talking more and more about what health care reform DOES, rather than playing D against lies, distortions and what it doesn’t do.

posted by perkiset on Aug 26

I’d love to write about how much Senator Edward Kennedy did in his life and help honor one of the great contemporary men of the Senate, but the Rude Pundit did a much finer job than I could ever imagine. So as a brazen scrape, here’s the essentials of his post.

 

Do you like your state and not the federal government controlling the curriculum of your kids’ schools? Thank Ted Kennedy.

Do you like being able to vote starting at age 18? Thank Ted Kennedy.

Do you think low-income people should get help with heating their homes in the winter? Thank the man.

Do you think the federal government should fund cancer research? Yep.

Do you believe that Meals on Wheels is a good thing? Ditto.

Does your daughter (or you, if you’re female) like playing soccer or basketball or softball at school? That’d be because of Ted Kennedy.

Do you think that disabled people should be able to go to school? Have access to buildings? Not be discriminated against for housing and loads of other things? Kennedy, big time.

You like your cheap airfares? You know the answer.

You think people on welfare oughta get jobs? So did Kennedy.

You think mental institutions should treat people humanely? Yeah, so did your new friend, Ted Kennedy.

You believe that the Defense Department should provide child care for the kids of soldiers? Kennedy did.

You think a woman shouldn’t lose her job if she gets pregnant? You think 100,000 more cops on the street’s a good idea? You think poor kids should have health care? You think soldiers in Iraq should have the proper armor? Just tick those things off the list. Some of them would have been accomplished without him; many would not have been.

You agreed with Ted Kennedy far, far more than you want to think you did, dear conservatives. Still, go ahead and dance your mad jigs on his still-warm corpse. Why not? We on the left certainly did when Jerry Falwell, Strom Thurmond, and Jesse Helms kicked. Hell, one asshole blogger even celebrated the death of Ann Coulter’s father. But know that you dance in ignorance. Ask Orrin Hatch.

But, of course, you want to address the far more pressing issue of whether or not Ted Kennedy killed Mary Jo Kopechne back at Chappaquiddick all those decades ago, no matter what the investigations said. There’s only a couple of things to say about that: The glib response is, “Yeah, and Thomas Jefferson nailed his slaves. What’s your point?” More directly, Kennedy asked the people of Massachusetts if they wanted him to quit. They did not. The rest of the nation may have not wanted him as president, but for Massachusetts, Chappaquiddick quickly became a settled issue and distant history. That’s all that mattered to keep him in the Senate, just like Louisiana will have to judge whether or not a prostitute-lovin’ David Vitter should go back. That’s democracy, gang, like it or not.

And Ted Kennedy did more for real, actual democracy than almost anyone else in our entire history as a nation.

 

His allies and foes alike admired and respected him. As Biden said this morning, he made everyone bigger - he made our country bigger. His was a life of great service, despite great tragedy. I don’t know yet if this means more trouble for health care or not, but I hoping that they name a bill the Senator Ted Kennedy Bill and get it right, in his name.

posted by perkiset on Aug 25

Rest in peace, Senator Ted Kennedy. Lion of the Senate. Worked hard and served his constituency for the better part of his life. He died tonight at 77 years old of brain cancer.

He will be sorely missed.

posted by perkiset on Aug 24

Man I just laughed my butt off this morning. Check out this post at TPM central:

Roy Blunt Should Be Cleaned Out Of The Crapper

Now it’d probably come as no surprise that I don’t care for Steele, but if I were a Republican I’d be pretty pissed off as well. To equate a fellow Repub as a poop that needs to be cleaned out of the “crapper?” Good lord he’s a talent. If I was on your side guys, I’d be looking for someone other than a black Republican Joe Biden to be your primary party spokesman. ROFLMAO. Made some great Monday reading though.

posted by perkiset on Aug 12

Hope you can hold down lunch from this one:

Fox News gets okay to misinform public, court ruling

When an article leads off with, “The attorneys for Fox, owned by media baron Rupert Murdock, successfully argued the First Amendment gives broadcasters the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on the public airwaves” you know it’s going to draw my attention.

Now, I’m a first-amendment guy all the way. But this is beyond the pale. The problem for me is the illusion of reliability. Fox News wants to dress themselves in reputability, but wants to be able to say anything they fabricate. Again, I’m all for free speech. But it should be labeled “Op-Ed” or something. It should be clear that it is the OPINION of the broadcaster, not fact.

Now let’s see how long it is before some of my right-wing friends come to their aid. I expect, “MSNBC does the same!!!” No, they don’t. They’d have similar troubles I’m certain, if they did. You see, one of the journalists there, Jane Akre, threatened to expose that she was being forced to broadcast a deliberately misleading story. She was fired for it. She sued and won a $425K settlement that was appealed 3 times and she still won, but finally Murdoch’s lawyers won on the basis of the First Amendment, with a ruling that essentially says that lying is protected speech and not against any law.

And I’d agree. My problem is the ethics of it, not the law. At the very least, Limbaugh claims himself to be an entertainer, not The News. You can argue that you don’t like Rachel Maddow, but you cannot argue her facts, because she is well researched and does her homework. But Fox News uses the platform of News Distribution to promote their own political agenda - and that is wrong IMO. Fox News and indeed, the entire right wing, falsely claims the moral high ground and says that it’s the left that is misleading the public. This ought to go a ways towards breaking that lie up as well. Or as least I can hope.

Walter Cronkite, come to find out, was a very, very Liberal man. But this did not show in his news broadcasts - he worked tirelessly to promote NEWS and let the public decide.

This is part of a larger problem, having to do with corporations having “citizenship” and being brought under the protection of the 14th amendment. PEOPLE have the right to free speech (the First), but IMO corporations must be held accountable for what they say because they have a financial interest in the results of their efforts. If the lobbyists of today get their way, then corporations will have exactly the same rights as you and I do for free speech… but it should be obvious that their marketing budget is a little larger than ours. AIG could drop a billion dollars (literally) on promoting why a particular piece of legislation was bad, carpet bombing the entire political arena and voices like ours would have no say at all. It’s quite frightening actually and getting higher and higher on the radar. This is a topic for another day because it’s really huge, but this article makes a good starting point to get there.

Shame on Fox. Shame on them.

[edit: Added an interesting YouTube about the story as an afterward]


type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
allowscriptaccess="always"
allowfullscreen="true"
width="170"
height="150" />

Copyright © 2006-2010, ME3 Inc. All Rights Reserved
WordPress Theme by Perkiset