posted by perkiset on Jan 21

Unfortunately, we may well remember today as the day that the “great experiment in self governance” was finally undone.

Today, in an astonishing wave of judicial activism, corporatist judges (under the guise of being conservatives) voted to grant corporations personhood in a way that allows them to levy all of their vast power and finance against the government of the United States. In other words, my paltry campaign contributions are now in competition with General Electric.

But it doesn’t stop there. The ruling seems to allow for foreign held, and even multination conglomerates the same protections! Our future as a country may well now be in the hands of the board of directors for Toyota. I’m not being hyperbolic here: I’m restating the waves that are all over the blogosphere and RW media.

Read the ruling here: Supreme Court Ruling

This is a war that’s been quietly running for over a hundred years … today may be the final straw. This is the essence of why Fox can blather the way they do, or we still have debate about global warming (even though there is no real scientific debate, only political debate) or why health care in the US is labeled as a “socialist agenda” - because corporations with more money than God are allowed to “market” opinions that make money for them, rather than being in the populace of the U.S.’ best interest.

There are a variety of populist movements involved in getting a Constitutional amendment rolling that would eliminate corporate personhood and help us reclaim our democracy. I invite everyone to do so: no matter what party or leaning you are from, you have less voice with this sort of ruling in force. Here’s one place to start: Democracy Unlimited for a nice little local group or a national organization here: Move To Amend.org.

posted by perkiset on Dec 10

OK, I’ve been very conflicted on this, but the recent spate of nutjobs that are trying to push draconian rules against abortion through with the health bill have pushed me over the edge.

This is actually quite simple. First, the Constitution acknowledges that no person shall be less privileged in our country because or their choice of religion. This was further spelled out in ‘74 with the Souter court, that asserted that no religion shall take any precedence over another, nor religiosity over non-religiosity. So from a primary perspective, your religious notions of why someone else shouldn’t get an abortion are un-Constitutional.

But much more importantly, I don’t want my tax dollars used to kill Afghans. Or even prisoners (actually, we can’t even have a debate on capital punishment until we grapple with the reality that it is a cash cow for lawyers, yet provides little real justice to families of the victims). So I’ll tell you what: if we can write a bill that says no tax dollar will be used to kill someone, then I’ll relax on my notion. But so long as you want the right to say that YOUR tax dollar can’t be used for abortions (even though I am perfectly willing to let mine be), then we’ll be at an impasse. Because I don’t want MY tax dollars used for a war of aggression in the middle east.

How’s that? Can we come to an agreement here? I realize that you righties have managed to prove that SOME life is sacred, can we go all the way and call it a day?

posted by perkiset on Nov 6

Responding to the so-called Health Care riot, the Rude Pundit has, yet again, used humor to stab intensely at the core of this hyperbolic, ill conceived and frankly stupid outpouring by literally hundreds of people at the nation’s capital.

I don’t often post about the Rude Pundit because, although brilliant and hilarious, he is often over the top for most people. But in this case, it’s really perfect. Enjoy a Friday laugh if you dare!

“A modest proposal: Rape the guy holding the Holocaust sign”

This lunacy just simply must stop. The people whom are simply desperate to cut off their noses to spite their faces in the service of insurance company profits really must get better informed. “American Patriots” my ass. Unwitting supporters of fascism and a corporate aristocracy is more like it. I wonder how many of the older people there would actually be able to make it, if they didn’t have Medicare to take care of them?

posted by perkiset on Oct 13

Please, take a moment to go here and see what the anti-logic, head-in-sand crowd have cooked up for us this time:

http://www dot noteviljustwrong dot com/
(Sorry, just can’t even pass them link juice - you’ll need to repair the URL)

Its interesting to me, that you usually see the best scenes from a movie in the trailer… the funniest moments, teasers of the best scares… head jerks of the most mind blowing effects… well, when they get a toothless bathtub gin runner to claim that “Al gore just orta do this somewhere else” you just KNOW they’ve got a blockbuster on their hands.

The best amateur rebuttal to the film I’ve seen is here:
http://timpanogos.wordpress.com/2009/08/16/new-junk-science-movie-not-evil-just-wrong/

Sort of getting old, the discussion about how much things are going to cost, without even weighing in on the real human cost of ignoring this stuff. The movie seems horribly naive and politically motivated (in fairness, that’s what the right says about Al Gore and the whole climate movement crowd, but that’s only because that’s all they’ve got…) and although I’ll be over 100 miles away, I’ll be trying to blast back into town just to go see this Charlie Foxtrot of a pseudo-science debacle first hand. I’ve heard that the woman who’s bought out my favorite movie house for the day to show it is a birther that thinks Obama is a communist.

I can’t wait to meet her. :twisted:

posted by perkiset on Oct 9

Whooboy have the ‘tubes been rocking this morning.

Just in case you haven’t heard, President Obama was award the Nobel Peace Prize today. And the reactions couldn’t be more polarized or (in most cases) predictable.

First, from the President via TPM:

Calling himself “surprised and deeply humbled,” Obama said he does not feel he deserves to be in the company of the “transformative” and inspiring people who have earned the prize.

He said the prize often is given “as a means to give momentum to a set of causes.”

“I will accept this award as a call to action,” Obama said, outlining his goals - a world without nuclear weapons, confronting the threat of climate change and respectful of its peoples’ diverse religions and practices.

“These challenges can’t be met by any one leader or any one nation,” he said.

He called for “unwavering commitment to the rights of all Israelis and Palestinians to live in security in nations of their own.”

“This award is not simply about the efforts of my administration,” he said, it’s shared with everyone who fights for “justice and dignity.”

 

And from the right, a sensible and objective view from Rush:

“This fully exposes the illusion that is Barack Obama,” Limbaugh told POLITICO in an e-mail. “And with this ‘award’ the elites of the world are urging Obama, THE MAN OF PEACE, to not do the surge in Afghanistan, not take action against Iran and its nuclear program and to basically continue his intentions to emasculate the United States.”

Limbaugh continued: “They love a weakened, neutered U.S and this is their way of promoting that concept. I think God has a great sense of humor, too.”

 

In all fairness, it is absolutely valid to ask why President Obama would be given this award, particularly since he had been inaugurated only 2 days before the deadline for nominations. Are we to assume that the Nobel commission is simple a set of Obama fanbois? Socialists? Groupies? Or is there something larger here?

Perhaps the Nobel community has seen fit to actually award the American people themselves, for their decision to overthrow the awful policies of the past 8 years and choose a new path. Make no mistake, hiring a black liberal (well, not even that liberal, but at least a moderate) for the top job was no easy feat. But since it’s difficult to award 300 million people, they have chosen to do exactly what Obama has said: provide momentum to a movement.

We are on the verge of changing how we take care of ourselves with healthcare. Rather than deciding in a skinny minute to invade and rape a sovereign nation, Obama has clearly taken an extraordinarily patient, diligent and objective path to decide how to deal with the growing problems of Afghanistan. The financial system is far, FAR from being repaired, but it is on the way to being stable. Note that since we caused the current financial crisis (fair enough, other country’s firms didn’t have to purchase our mortgage backed securities or insure with swaps, but we created them and they probably thought we knew what we were doing) as well as the Iraq debacle, it’s probably seen as a good thing that we are starting to endeavor to clean up our mess.

If nothing else, the Nobel Peace Price highlights, with laser like focus and extreme acuity, the fact that we ARE different than we were in the last 8 years. Getting past “Change we can believe in” and all the rhetoric, we can say, unequivocally, that our direction has begun to change. That is equal parts extraordinary and vital.

I, for one, am grateful to the Nobel community for acknowledging our efforts towards being a global leader in peace and prosperity once again, rather than the neo-Imperialist asshats we’ve been for the last 8 years… and risk becoming again if we don’t stay on top of things.

Bravo, I say, to their efforts to assist with ours.

Copyright © 2006-2010, ME3 Inc. All Rights Reserved
WordPress Theme by Perkiset