<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vote For Any Democrat?</title>
	<link>http://www.perkiset.org/politics/2007/12/19/vote-for-any-democrat/</link>
	<description>Sheeple just piss me off. Be smart, talk facts.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Willyp??</title>
		<link>http://www.perkiset.org/politics/2007/12/19/vote-for-any-democrat/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Willyp??</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.perkiset.org/politics/2007/12/19/vote-for-any-democrat/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Hey son, I wouldn't be pissed with Biden or Dodd!  I don't like them as much as Kucinich, but you can't always have everything you want.  I first started voting in 1961, and I have never seen anything quite like this before.  It is obvious that the media is owned by the corporations, only wanting us to focus on the banal and meaningless, rather than the substantive.  I have yet to hear a real exploration of candidates positions on issues.  It's all sound bites and photo ops.

The Ron Paul thing is interesting.  He is either a loon, a goon or a buffoon.  His position on the war is becoming silly (ie: out in 3 months . . . a tactical impossibility), on the economy is really simplistic (ie: let it go, the market will take care of it), and on a sense of social responsibility, he is downright irresponsible (let people do whatever they want.  Dont tell them what to do.).  What silliness.

The sad thing is that no one is really considering what either Kucinich or Edwards are saying about corporations.  They are simply dismissed as unelectable and therefore irrelevant.  Well why don't we all vote for Kucinich and elect him.  I'm going to.

As far as the woman vs black thing, I think it is a dodge to avoid the real issues.  I agree with your Maggie Thatcher allusion, but don't forget Bhutto, Indira Ghandi, and other women who did great things all month long.  Concerning the fear of electing either a racial or gender different candidate, we as Democrats have always stood in fear of how the red neck assholes are going to react.  I think it is time to make them come into tow.  It is time for us to be brave and take back our democracy.

Venceremos!

Dad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey son, I wouldn&#8217;t be pissed with Biden or Dodd!  I don&#8217;t like them as much as Kucinich, but you can&#8217;t always have everything you want.  I first started voting in 1961, and I have never seen anything quite like this before.  It is obvious that the media is owned by the corporations, only wanting us to focus on the banal and meaningless, rather than the substantive.  I have yet to hear a real exploration of candidates positions on issues.  It&#8217;s all sound bites and photo ops.</p>
<p>The Ron Paul thing is interesting.  He is either a loon, a goon or a buffoon.  His position on the war is becoming silly (ie: out in 3 months . . . a tactical impossibility), on the economy is really simplistic (ie: let it go, the market will take care of it), and on a sense of social responsibility, he is downright irresponsible (let people do whatever they want.  Dont tell them what to do.).  What silliness.</p>
<p>The sad thing is that no one is really considering what either Kucinich or Edwards are saying about corporations.  They are simply dismissed as unelectable and therefore irrelevant.  Well why don&#8217;t we all vote for Kucinich and elect him.  I&#8217;m going to.</p>
<p>As far as the woman vs black thing, I think it is a dodge to avoid the real issues.  I agree with your Maggie Thatcher allusion, but don&#8217;t forget Bhutto, Indira Ghandi, and other women who did great things all month long.  Concerning the fear of electing either a racial or gender different candidate, we as Democrats have always stood in fear of how the red neck assholes are going to react.  I think it is time to make them come into tow.  It is time for us to be brave and take back our democracy.</p>
<p>Venceremos!</p>
<p>Dad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perkiset</title>
		<link>http://www.perkiset.org/politics/2007/12/19/vote-for-any-democrat/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>perkiset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 02:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.perkiset.org/politics/2007/12/19/vote-for-any-democrat/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>I'm in about the same boat I'm afraid... none of them really excite me at all. And I'm right with you that SOMEONE has got to do something about healthcare, but I doubt it will happen this time around.

::sigh::</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in about the same boat I&#8217;m afraid&#8230; none of them really excite me at all. And I&#8217;m right with you that SOMEONE has got to do something about healthcare, but I doubt it will happen this time around.</p>
<p>::sigh::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vsloathe</title>
		<link>http://www.perkiset.org/politics/2007/12/19/vote-for-any-democrat/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>vsloathe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.perkiset.org/politics/2007/12/19/vote-for-any-democrat/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Just can't get excited about any of them. Granted, it would be best if the office of the President were stripped back down to the its former role so that some checks and balances in our governmental system could once again be established. If that were to happen, it wouldn't really matter who got elected.

Quite frankly, whoever I think is most likely to vanquish this piss-poor and broken healthcare system that favors those who can deny the most coverage will get my vote. Hillary's been bought by them. She tried once and all signs point to it being considered a lost cause for her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just can&#8217;t get excited about any of them. Granted, it would be best if the office of the President were stripped back down to the its former role so that some checks and balances in our governmental system could once again be established. If that were to happen, it wouldn&#8217;t really matter who got elected.</p>
<p>Quite frankly, whoever I think is most likely to vanquish this piss-poor and broken healthcare system that favors those who can deny the most coverage will get my vote. Hillary&#8217;s been bought by them. She tried once and all signs point to it being considered a lost cause for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perkiset</title>
		<link>http://www.perkiset.org/politics/2007/12/19/vote-for-any-democrat/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>perkiset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.perkiset.org/politics/2007/12/19/vote-for-any-democrat/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>"A mouthy teenager of a nation" Cripes pal, it's clear the writer's strike is over - that's just rich. 

I agree with you about 95% - I am just not yet ready to believe that those same bigoted buttwipes would rather see a whoaman runnin' the show than a black MAN. "Mebbe heez a nigger'nall, but hell, at least he's got nuts whenee needzum!" I dunno, I just don't see them going to war for a woman yet either.

I think either would be a great thing to say to the world... but right after the we're so cool party, it'll be pretty important that they are somewhat uniters for the nation rather than the wedgeworks we've had in power for the last 7 years. And another fear I have is that Hillary will be as hated as Dubya, furthering the schism rather than starting a heal... if in fact any such miracle is ever again to be seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A mouthy teenager of a nation&#8221; Cripes pal, it&#8217;s clear the writer&#8217;s strike is over - that&#8217;s just rich. </p>
<p>I agree with you about 95% - I am just not yet ready to believe that those same bigoted buttwipes would rather see a whoaman runnin&#8217; the show than a black MAN. &#8220;Mebbe heez a nigger&#8217;nall, but hell, at least he&#8217;s got nuts whenee needzum!&#8221; I dunno, I just don&#8217;t see them going to war for a woman yet either.</p>
<p>I think either would be a great thing to say to the world&#8230; but right after the we&#8217;re so cool party, it&#8217;ll be pretty important that they are somewhat uniters for the nation rather than the wedgeworks we&#8217;ve had in power for the last 7 years. And another fear I have is that Hillary will be as hated as Dubya, furthering the schism rather than starting a heal&#8230; if in fact any such miracle is ever again to be seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: braindonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.perkiset.org/politics/2007/12/19/vote-for-any-democrat/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>braindonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.perkiset.org/politics/2007/12/19/vote-for-any-democrat/#comment-188</guid>
		<description>to comment specifically on the Lieberman endorsement of McCain. I think this was purely a "duck out" move on his part. Aside from the fact that when he talks I pray for deafness to strike me, he is not a dumb guy. McCain can't win, and Lieberman has been jilted by his own original party to some extent, so how better to fully portray himself as a 'new found man' of independence and non-partisan thinking, than to endorse a very visible figure from the other side of the original isle.

Sure they agree on some things, but its pretty obvious when you endorse a lame duck that you are just trying to end the questions and giving a subtle "fuck you" to the people you used to side with.

On the topic of Hillary. I agree, she is yet-another-politician. But I think the best message that this country could send to the rest of the world, that we are ready to grow up and stop being a mouthy teenager of a nation, would be to elect a woman into office. Does she have some opinions that I disagree with? of course, but I am never going to find a candidate I agree with most, just one I disagree with least. Universal Healthcare, children first, environment, less war, more hugging, etc.

Also, i think this country is more ready to vote a woman into office vs a black man. It sucks, but it's true. Do you think the majority of middle america, the south, and redneck country can handle the idea of a black guy making decisions that will appear to affect their lives? Doubt it. But... It would score major points again in the 'we are growing up' image we need to portray.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to comment specifically on the Lieberman endorsement of McCain. I think this was purely a &#8220;duck out&#8221; move on his part. Aside from the fact that when he talks I pray for deafness to strike me, he is not a dumb guy. McCain can&#8217;t win, and Lieberman has been jilted by his own original party to some extent, so how better to fully portray himself as a &#8216;new found man&#8217; of independence and non-partisan thinking, than to endorse a very visible figure from the other side of the original isle.</p>
<p>Sure they agree on some things, but its pretty obvious when you endorse a lame duck that you are just trying to end the questions and giving a subtle &#8220;fuck you&#8221; to the people you used to side with.</p>
<p>On the topic of Hillary. I agree, she is yet-another-politician. But I think the best message that this country could send to the rest of the world, that we are ready to grow up and stop being a mouthy teenager of a nation, would be to elect a woman into office. Does she have some opinions that I disagree with? of course, but I am never going to find a candidate I agree with most, just one I disagree with least. Universal Healthcare, children first, environment, less war, more hugging, etc.</p>
<p>Also, i think this country is more ready to vote a woman into office vs a black man. It sucks, but it&#8217;s true. Do you think the majority of middle america, the south, and redneck country can handle the idea of a black guy making decisions that will appear to affect their lives? Doubt it. But&#8230; It would score major points again in the &#8216;we are growing up&#8217; image we need to portray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
